Showing posts with label MMA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label MMA. Show all posts

Friday, October 18, 2024

Wrong direction?

 Sometimes I can't help noticing that we live in a world where everything is quantified, so the notions of success and achievement are based on measurements, typically in an attempt to be (quasi)scientific in one's approach to training. While such a view has some value in certain domains, particularly in a professional sport field, I believe that in some other practices it might be (at least occasionally) harmful. 

Even in a very streamlined sport of weight lifting, for example, there are so many factors involved (sleep, mood, state of health etc.) that it would be ill-advised to focus on the numbers as the sole indicator of progress. More than once have I seen a lifter miserable after a good session, because they failed to reach a goal that was a number on the paper (or the screen). How do you quantify quality or pleasure?

Things get even more complex in an oppositional skill based arena that is martial arts and combat sports. For a lot of people involved in these, there is this idea of making progress by "getting to the next level", which entails learning advanced techniques and/or more new maneuvers. You see it everywhere, from the modern BJJ and MMA gyms and their new tricks of the trade, to the traditional schools, where the new belt means new forms and techniques. We always strive to get to a new step and climb higher on the chosen ladder of success. 

But what if that is a wrong viewpoint? After all, they say that advanced techniques are the basics done really well, right? Wouldn't that mean we ought to get deeper, not higher? Hey, even the Earth's structure prefers depths to heights!


So, let me try and provide some answers to the above questions. I happen to be a proponent of the basics done well school of thought, because the concept of deep skill is the foundation for the execution of advanced tactics and strategies. In other words, with an excellent command of a finite set of skills/techniques, one has the confidence and cognitive resources to use them in solving the changing demands of a dynamic combative situation. A classic example may be the legendary Bill "Superfoot" Wallace, who decided to train his kicking techniques only with the left foot, but make it so good that his opponents had difficulties dealing with it, despite knowing what to expect. Or Rickson Gracie rolling each participant in a seminar and submitting them all with the same technique! 

Therefore, with a proper learning and training process it is possible to develop required attributes, thus being able to overcome most challenges faced in the process of training and/or application. I know, we are constantly exposed to so much novelties in training and bombarded with all kinds of (dis)information, so it can be really hard to keep it at bay while maintaining focus. Yet, we are often reminded that "Jack of all trades is a master of none..."

"...but often better than the master of one!", however! Wait, what? Aren't I contradicting myself? Well, not really. See, IMHO, one needs to be a comprehensivist in terms of areas of competence, but then a deep diver in each of them. Naturally, the number of those areas of competence will depend on your purpose in training - sport, cultural study, recreation etc. Let's say you are a MMA practitioner with competitive inclination: you would need to develop some functional skillset in standup/striking range, clinch/wrestling and the ground/grappling game. Now, if you have previous background in one of the disciplines that are typically perceived as "main ingredients" of MMA (i.e. (kick/Thai)boxing, wrestling, judo, sambo, BJJ), it could be possible and maybe even recommended to build a strategic approach of taking the fight to your area of expertise, with solid defense in all the others.

Let's see what the deep dive consist of, then. The first thing would be to identify a finite set of techniques and tactics that make the functional foundation within that area and then work on truly internalizing and integrating them, to a degree that we could improvise and play with them at will. For example: in the standup game - jab, cross, front hook, low kick and (maybe) front kick, corresponding parries and defenses; in the clinch game - a couple of controls and takedown from wrestling (underhook, weezer, single leg), head/neck control and a couple of elbow and knee strikes from Thai-boxing, takedown defense/sprawl; on the ground - essential positional control, 2-3 escapes for each position, 2-3 submissions from each position, a couple of fundamental sweeps/reversals, and fundamental ground and pound options. 

Huh, it is still quite a bit... But, if you get deeply skilled in those, there will almost certainly be no need for jumping or spinning kicks and backfists, scissor throws and suplexes, berimbolos and lasso guard or calf slicers. Leave those to the folks specializing (i.e. deep diving) in those singular disciplines.

If your aim is on the pavement arena of self-protection, you will also want to address hand held weapons (impact and edged...firearms if it fits your legal environment), with emphasis on access and deployment, along with a couple of low-risk and effective techniques/strikes, while discarding the twirling and flipping stuff. (There are quite a few reviews of the applicable instructional volumes on this blog). When it comes to defense, focus on control over disarming. While on the subject of street self-defense, if you try running a couple of scenarios that involve multiple attackers, it will quickly become obvious which physical techniques and tactics are to be prioritized (footwork, standing wrestling, straight punches, low line kicking). 

Thanks to the easy access to video footage of all kinds of physical situations, it is relatively easy to figure out what are the technical and tactical tools that should be prioritized, so-called high percentage ones, in order to avoid straying away from your training mission. 

After that, all you need is to dig in...deep! 

Saturday, May 28, 2022

Jumping ship?

 

No one has all the answers, right? After all, this is why we cross train. And, nowadays cross-training has become accepted so much that is almost kind of a norm. Although some thirty years ago it was seen by many as the expression of humanity’s lowest impulses, MMA has become possibly the most popular combat sport of our time, especially in terms of the mainstream media exposure. It may even be fair to say that the success of MMA has brought more attention back to the traditional Olympic fighting events such as judo, boxing and wrestling.

So, the revolution that Bruce Lee was preaching almost six decades ago is now a common state of affairs…or is it?

There is a segment of training in martial arts and related disciplines that exhibits much more conservative attitude, and no, I do not have ultra-traditional arts and systems in mind. As much as training in several different methods is widely accepted, there is still a lot of frowning upon the attempt to train simultaneously in two (or more) different schools of the same system or style. For some reason, if a person wanted to train in two different BJJ or karate schools, and just the same for two schools of the same kung fu system, or even two boxing clubs, they are deemed disloyal, back-stabbing, untrustworthy kind of character.

While I might understand the sentiment if at issue is a competitor jumping ship, it doesn’t make sense when talking about a serious enthusiast who may not be focused on competition. What is wrong if someone wants to see how different instructors and coaches treat the same situations? On top of it, for the most part it is completely OK to attend seminars of instructors from other lineages, but training regularly in different schools is a no-no.

Granted, at lower, beginning levels of training such practice may be counterproductive, as the trainee could focus on collecting techniques and tricks instead of focusing on developing strong fundamental principles, but after a few years? As a thought experiment, let’s say you have 8+ years in BJJ, with a lot of money and time at disposal. And you happen to be equally close to the schools run by Marcelo Garcia, John Danaher and Mario Sperry, who all have classes on different days and times. What is wrong by visiting each (or two of them) two or three times a week, as opposed to staying with just one four times a week?

Or, being a boxer of 10 years, and having both Teddy Atlas and Freddy Roach within reach, with a similar set of circumstances as above. Would you tap the knowledge source of both, or chose one to follow?

It bears saying that sometimes two instructors will have approaches that really do not fit, or even contradict each other, and in such case it is definitely better to opt for one. However, if one is looking to get as well rounder view of a discipline as possible, it only makes sense to learn from more than one source. Especially so if you are, or strive to be, an instructor yourself at some point.

Or maybe the whole “problem” is endemic to the place(s) that I have been frequenting, while entirely non-existent elsewhere?

Thursday, January 28, 2021

Choosing chances

 Probably one of the most common points of contention among martial artists and fight game practitioners (and even more so among the many couch experts and keyboard warriors) is the old saying "that will never work in a real fight". Quite often, such comments essentially stem from good intentions, but the subsequent debate may spiral out of control. The issue here is the lack of actual criteria in defining what it means for a technique/maneuver to work, what is a real fight, or even what does never truly mean.

For the purpose of this article, let's describe the real fight as an encounter where the participants fully strive to hinder or prevent the realization of the other side's ideas, while simultaneously imposing their own, as well as accomplishing whatever is their desired outcome. Please note that there is no mention of presence or absence of rules, number of participants, or any other circumstances that would imply the categories of sport, street, battlefield etc. 

The next notion - work - is easier, if it simply means "achieving the desired effect". So, it is not the matter of doing it as a complete set of motions, but rather of affecting the opponent in a way that reduces their chance of emerging victorious. 

Finally, the span or rigor of never is...well, flexible. Sometimes somebody will manage to pull off a technique that nobody else has done before, and a lot of commentators will then hang onto it as the ultimate proof of the said technique's effectiveness, although it may have been a fluke or never happening again. On the other hand, it could actually been a workable move from a competent exponent that simply no one has attempted to do before in earnest (think head kicks in MMA before Maurice Smith), but the naysayers will insist it was a lucky strike. 

This is where the notion of high percentage material comes in. Just like the label indicates - it is a maneuver that works more often that it doesn't. Now, there might be a whole bunch of reasons for it to succeed at one time and fail at another, but it seems to me that the main leverage point is the current readiness and level of the person on the receiving end. Let's take a look at this example:


The fact that the contestants are engaged in a full contact stick duel without head gear dictates different fight dynamics than otherwise, but the overall image of a Dog Brother event is still present. At 1:50 in the clip, the veteran fighter Eric Top Dog Knaus does the entry under the roof block that has served him countless times in over three decades of full contact fights. His choice of opportunity is excellent, too, being that his opponent is almost back against the wall, i.e. with no space to maintain the distance. However, Mr. Johnson on the other side does a brilliant job of sideways movement to evade the force of the attack, while still maintaining close enough distance to control the fight from that point and end it in his favor. 

What can we learn here? Several things... For one, the fact that something has worked consistently for you a hundred times is not a guarantee of the 101st. On the other side of the coin, even if something has failed consistently so far, but happens to be the only viable option in a given moment - go for it! Interestingly enough, there is a dualistic trend in fight training - once the high percentage offensive techniques are identified, there is a strong focus on defenses against those, which then become high percentage defensive techniques that do not deny the high percentage status to the offensive ones! This is why I highlighted the factor of the person on the other side. 

The bottom line is, your training can cover all of the bases if you put adequate priorities on its various elements, and in line with your big picture training goals. You "just" have to work on it.

Tuesday, May 22, 2018

Running in circles, and getting somewhere

There are varying, and sometimes colliding, attitudes towards the role of cyclical, give-and-take drills done in martial arts. A typical example of those would be the familiar approach to them in Filipino martial arts, commonly known as hubud drills. Some proponents believe these are essential for the development of certain attributes, others that they are complete waste of time. Admittedly, I have been on both sides of the rift at some point, so now I hope to provide some insight into how to do such drills in order to bridge the gap in perceptions on their value.

For starters, let's take a look at a typical example of the kind of drills we are talking about.



The supporters of such training will claim that its main goals are line familiarization, developing the flow, learning about proper mechanical structure of the techniques etc. On the other hand, the
skeptics about the value of circular drills, mostly coming from the MMA or BJJ (sports) background, underline that they are static and lack energy/resistance, thus failing to prepare the practitioners for any realistic application whatsoever.

Now, there are certain shortsighted misconceptions in both camps. In so many instances, when the students lose sight of the end goal and keep doing the drill for the sake of just doing it, i.e. when the means is mistaken for the goal, they stay at this beginning stage and then all those objections from the critics then apply in full.

Interestingly, though, the sport crowd fails to see that there are training methods of that ilk are widespread in their domain as well. One such example would be the following positional drill in BJJ:


As it seems, the aim of this exercise is the familiarization with typical positions of the discipline (line familiarization?) and getting used to go from one to another seamlessly (developing flow?). Take notice of how the training partner is utterly static and not providing any resistance. Naturally, the response is that at issue is just the beginning phase of training and that at some point the person on the bottom will start offering resistance and actively attempting to hinder the top person's movements.

Another point might be that it is not even the cyclical drill of the give-and-take type as utilized in the FMA circles. OK, then how about the next one:


In this pummeling drill we clearly see the static phase and predetermined moves, along with little to no resistance. However, the training does not end there! Towards the end of the video, the trainees start adding footwork and moving with energy. And this is where those more "traditional" schools of Asian martial arts should look for some effective tweaks to their own training.

Still, in all fairness, some of those schools have been doing it fine all along. From a personal experience, after having learned some basic hubud drills I did them for a short while simply because they were fun and flashy when dome at speed (great for demos). But then, I completely abandoned them because they did not transfer well into sparring. Later, nevertheless, under the tutelage of guro Roger Agbulos, it became clear that when trained properly, these drills can offer some tangible value in terms of transfer to other, more alive and energetic modes of training. Here is an example of him coaching some intricacies of this work.


From here on, it is easy to also introduce timing variations, feints etc, ultimately using the basic drill as a springboard for further exploration and growth. Personally, my take is that all drills, being what they are - drills, are the means to isolate and better understand particular segments of the whole picture that is combat. Consequently, they should be treated as such - use them for what they're for and either move on or expand/adapt once they have served their purpose. Still, let's not not throw the baby out with the bathwater and miss on worth aspects of any training method because it is useless or harmful when implemented improperly. 

Wednesday, June 15, 2016

Move that body baby...

Hey, good news! The article that used to be here can now be found over at my friend (and brilliant coach) Mladen's site  http://complementarytraining.net/category/free-content/
The text is pretty much the same, but the video attached as illustration is a bit better, so I hope you will enjoy it. 



In the meantime, also feel free to search Youtube for the clips titled pelokinetic fitness in order to see more material of the same nature, as well the page of the same name on Facebook.

Saturday, July 25, 2015

Challenges in training - congruency

Do you ever ruminate on how many various aspects have impact on the way you train, and down the road, possibly, on how effective your training is? Obviously, certain approaches to training dictate the manner of doing it, but how far/deep do we really ponder on those things?

Let me explain MY meaning behind the term congruency as used here. It would be - training in the way that most closely resemble the circumstances of the performance that the training process is meant to prepare us for. May sound obvious, but is it really? Let's see how far I can take it...

But of course...

For the purposes of this writeup, I will focus on the "functional" motivation for training in combative/martial activities (be it competition or self-protection), thus leaving out those driven by the aesthetic urges. What I will be saying here may also apply to the primarily traditional and historical students of martial ARTS, albeit in a slightly different manner.

So, for the above declared purpose of functional training, things could look fairly simple on the first sight - make sure to train with partners that resist enough to present the adequate challenge, while adhering to the governing rules of the event we are preparing for (where applicable). In sports...well, is there anything more to it that needs being mentioned? Let me put it this way - I remember reading an account of Royler Gracie training his students at the academy for an upcoming competition. Namely, the students were complaining about having to train with air-conditioning turned off and windows on the gym closed, in the heat of the Brazilian summer.  Royler's response was something along the lines of: "You will understand once we get to the venue - a stuffy, crowded arena without AC"! See, it makes sense, right? It is now easy to understand that all the people who trained in those nice, ventilated and cooled gyms would have more things to deal with.

By the same token, still in terms of sport-related activities, do you always train in the same conditions, simply because that is how things are in your training place? What if the competition hall will have much brighter or dimmer lights? Different mats maybe? Will you take it for granted and try to "go with the flow" or maybe try to somehow emulate those differences in training?

Now, we move on to the "real world, self defense" side of  the tracks. Obviously, the sheer number of all imaginable situations is impossible to be replicated in training, but there are some common denominators that are very important. For starters, do you even train always in the same place? If so, does it dictate the kind of clothes you will wear during the sessions, or even more importantly, the footwear? Let's say there are no such "house rules"...but let's say it is an indoor location. So, do you always work out in the clothes that are most comfortable for you? You know, the sport shoes, sweatsuit, shorts, t-shit... But what if you spend most of your days wearing jeans, boots, maybe a vest and a helmet? Yeah, construction worker of sorts! Would it make a difference"?

How about stepping out and actually trying a change in the training environment itself? I have already written elsewhere about uneven surfaces, disproportionate force etc. But there is more to it. If we address the issue of fighting with and against weapons, mixing it up with different "tools" is not the only concern... How do you choose your training weapons/facsimiles? Is it simply the matter of availability/price, or do you actually try to make it as close in looks and feel to the one you carry on you daily? Do you even carry? If not, you probably hope for using what happens to be at hand in the case of "may you never need it" going down the drain. But then, are you diversified enough? Maybe somebody may think that if you spend some time with a good FMA group it would cover quite a wide scope of options - after all once you are handy with an eskrima/arnis stick and knife, it is easy to adapt. Hm, not to burst anybody's bubble, but from experience I can tell you that a lead pipe or a baseball bat behave differently, and require some time spent on getting acquainted with. But moreover, could you use a brick or a rock with some effectiveness? Flexible implements like chains and belts? Hey, let's go back to our construction worker! Can you handle a hammer combatively?


With all that off my chest, I hope to get a bit more coherent now. The point of this article was not have you lose focus in training or "spread you thin", depending on the available time for working on your fighting ability. Obviously, we need to look at things from the possible vs. probable perspective and in line with Pareto's law find out what techniques and methods will give the most bang for the buck...especially for a beginner or someone on the early stages of training.

No, my message was - DON'T get complacent and stuck in a rut! If nothing else, there are some ides here to entertain and play with during the summer vacation ;-)

Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Recommended fitness books

Wow! When I started working on this article, I did not expect it would turn out to be so long. I apologize if you find it bothersome, but one has to be fair in his labor of love, right? After all, this will hopefully give you a better insight into what to expect of these products.


One of my earlier posts touched upon the need to include some sort of organized and regular physical preparation regimen into your training. While that post was received with approval by several of the people whose opinion I care for, some others were asking if there was some sort of aid that could help them in putting together a strength & conditioning program that would fit their need. Since all of those inquiries came from the people from the domain of martial arts[i], here are my recommendations…

Joel Jamieson – ULTIMATE MMA CONDITIONING

Yeah, the title threw me off a bit at first as well. However, if there was ever a book whose title claims to be ultimate something, and delivered – than this is the one! What makes it so good is the fact that the author addresses some very important topics that are almost never seen in other books, as well as his approach to the subject. This manual takes the first place in this review for a reason, although the next two are good and have something unique to offer. However, if you were to obtain any two books mentioned here, make sure that one of them is the “Ultimate MMA Conditioning”.


Namely, from the very get go of the book, Jamieson stresses what is probably the hallmark of his method – individual needs of each particular athlete/fighter! Once his fundamental training philosophy is set like that, it dictates the presentation of the material throughout out chapters that follow. Another think is that the author believes into his customers/readers needing to know all the WHYs of doing the things he preaches (now you understand my inclination to this book J ). As a result, he discusses the scientific rationale for each of the training methods he uses, but instead of trying to sound like an authority by making it all sound beyond the reach of a mere mortal, everything is rather nicely broken down and simplified to the point needed for the best possible comprehension. If you still do not get it…well, I guess you should have paid more attention during the science classes back in school.

The book starts with the chapter that points to most common mistakes that fighters make in attempt to work on their physical preparation, and then progresses to laying foundation for the proper planning. To that end, he stresses a few necessary principles:
-         the role of strength and conditioning; probably best summed by Jamieson himself as “developing the ability to effectively utilize their skills as fast and as long as possible”. If you prefer it in other words, the best possible transfer of your training into your performance.
-         biological power; essential concept for having a better look at the “bigger picture” of your training. Once you have a grasp of this, everything else falls in place much easier.
-         systematic approach to physical preparation; here the author explains how the operative systems of the body (depicted in the previous section) work together, and what sort of developments are looked for in cohesion, in order to make one’s training effective.
-         specificity of adaptation; a short section but a must read! This is where most program will either succeed or fail, and understanding the need for desired physiological adaptation is crucial for being in the former group.
-         general adaptation syndrome; Again, why the whole is bigger than the sum of its parts, and why your training needs to be systematic.

The second chapter is titled “Energy systems Development 101” and this is what made Jamieson probably one of the best currently most sought-after coaches and presenters/lecturers in the field of S&C. here, he discusses what conditioning really is, and what it means for fighting[i]. In short, explained is the significance of the processes of energy production and utilization, and then you have the overview of the energy systems that run our bodies: aerobic, anaerobic lactic and anaerobic alactic.

In the third chapter, we move to the treatment of the aerobic system. Here, the author sets the method of presentation for other systems as well – the meaning of this system in MMA; the adaptations is requires; methods of eliciting those adaptations (in this case, cardiac output, power intervals, tempo method, threshold training etc).

Next comes the coverage of the anaerobic lactic system. What I found very interesting and informative here was the report on some long held beliefs on the nature of fatigue and how they may have been wrong. Again, we get to understand the role of this system and  learn methods to improve on it (power intervals, capacity intervals, circuit training…).

Following is, of course, the chapter on the anaerobic alactic system, why and how to train it (intervals, max effort, complex method etc).

Once all this is behind us, Jamieson moves to the “nuts and bolts” of his training methodology, i.e. describes the programming and management of the training process. He explains how to put the pieces together in a coherent way. We learn that the author adheres to the so-called block periodization approach and what it means. In practice, it translates as the understanding of general and specific conditioning and how to order those in succession.

Chapter seven describes the realization of one’s general training program. It starts with basic programming guidelines, such as: training to maximize strengths and minimize weaknesses; training right motor qualities together; testing, assessing and tracking your progress; integration of your fitness regimen with your skill work; using the 8 week block system.

From there on, the specific blocks are presented, each specifying the methods to assess and develop:
-         general endurance
-         general strength
-         explosive speed and power
-         power-endurance

Naturally, what comes next is the info on the application of the accumulated knowledge in training – designing individual programs, selecting means and methods, organizing loads to attain desired effects, managing volume and intensity, avoiding and recovering from overtraining.

Finally, we move to the specific conditioning section in chapter eight, or as the book has it titled “Getting Ready to Fight”. Again, Jamieson first lays the foundational principles, and then proceeds to the training of specific physical qualities in the proper order. The final section of this chapter gives the overall plan of how to conduct your preparation during the week of the fight, thus tackling the issues such as making weight, resting and recovering and maintaining the results you had achieved thus far.

Since the publishing of this book, Joel Jamieson has introduced even more progressive insights in personal fitness and athletic training (just search for HRV training on the Internet), but the material presented in the book will certainly take you to the new level of your own training, like it did for guys like Rich Franklin, Jens Pulver, Demetrious Johnson and many other top-level fighters.

To order the manual and also learn loads of good things on training, check out the author’s website www.8weeksout.com

NOTICE: this book does not offer any “easy to follow” sample workout plans and routines, nor are the exercises and training methods sown in big pictures! Also, there is no mention of how to organize any single training session, i.e. warm up, stretching etc. having in mind the declared purpose of the manual – it delivers, no doubt about it…just make sure to know what you are expecting out of it.

Martin Rooney – TRAINING FOR WARRIORS

Before Martin Rooney, the physical preparation in the domain of MMA was almost in the stone age phase. His work with Renzo Gracie’s team has set the standards of what a good, properly executed S&C training regimen should look like, and now the sport is what it is largely owing to that.


Being that it was written and published before the previous book, in the time what a lot of people in MMA (and martial arts in general) were pretty much clueless about the advances in modern sports training, Ronney’s book is profusely illustrated, and in certain aspects, covers more ground than Jamieson’s.

Firs three chapters actually give an overview of what MMA is and what are the overall technical requirements form a competent fighter, which should also start shedding some light on the complexity of training that it demands. In the fourth chapter, we are instructed that all of the training methods to be presented can be realized without any equipment, but then the authors recommends a few implements in order to maximize your training (barbells and dumbbells, medicine and physio balls, dragging sled, pull-up bars etc).

Then, we go to more specific stuff. Rooney first touches upon an area that everybody seems to be taking for granted – mental aspect. Here, we see what makes a warrior (nowadays, this term has been so overused that I cringe at it, but this is what the book calls it), because these elements will dictate whether the trainee will even engage in this sort of training, and if they do, how far they will be ready to push themselves.

Next in line is a warm up section. This is another segment that everybody knows is important, yet this is the most often the one to “just get it over with”. Well, if you want to do it properly, follow along with this chapter. It shows the stationary exercises, movement drills, muscle activation exercises (more important that many people will think), often neglected upper body warm ups – without tools and with medicine ball.

From there on, the author addresses the physical training in a way that many people are best accustomed to. He divides the body in parts and then describes how to train each – neck; chest and shoulders; arm and hand; back; abs; heart and lung (yes, it’s the conditioning part); hips; glutes and quads; hamstrings; foot and ankle. What this achieves is that different needs are addressed, depending on the body parts. For example, some chapters will include both mobility and strength exercises.

The chapter on flexibility training comes as a separate one, but presented in a similar manner like the previous ones, although the entire body is run through the exercises in the same chapter.

The next section of the book moves to training programs, and it opens up with important, yet frequently misunderstood topics of weight cutting and nutrition, and in a rather detailed manner. If you are actually training for fights, you seriously need this info.

The chapter on injuries is an excellent one! Now, we’ve all had some, and probably even have to deal with reoccurring ones, and Ronney offers a strategy of dealing with injuries in the form of a list. Without going into all ten of them, I feel there are at least two that are absolutely necessary to really take to heart:
  1. Accept that the injury has happened, and move forward;
  2. (actually number 9 in his list) Develop a list of things that the injury is trying to tell you.
Finally, we come to the program of “Warrior Workouts”. It also happens to be a program of eight weeks, but presented as a ready made plan, describing every workout of every week. The system is based on 4 weekly workouts – one upper body; one lower body; and two of what the author calls hurricane sessions.

Of course, not each and every single one of those sessions has to be executed absolutely to the last detail. The logistics you have on disposal will play a major role in your ability to realize some of those, but that is why all of the chapters on particular body parts have exercises that are done without any equipment, as well as those with various tools, so you could try to replace the listed ones with something that should hopefully achieve similar effect.

If you are a beginner in this field of training, Ronney’s books may be a better starting pint than Jamieson’s. However, if you take your training seriously, and especially if you are aiming to be a coach, at one point you will need to develop the kind of understanding that is provided by Jamieson.

Training for Warriors – the Team Renzo Gracie Workout

OK, obviously this book builds on and draws heavily from the “main” manual, but some of the info is presented in a way that I liked a little bit better, plus there are some chapters that deal with topics that were not mentioned in the previous.



Without going into too much detail, there are valuable insights into the areas such as punching speed and plyometric training; role of the cornerman in a fight; strategy analysis; additional (excellent) info about injuries; conditioning to taking impact from your opponent’s strikes; lessons from competition; motivation; Q&A chapter etc.

This book, at some 190 pages is smaller than the “main” manual (over 300), but I feel it has enough of good information (almost like being there with them, watching the training process) in there to be worthy of adding it to your library.

Rooney’s books used to be widely available from most online bookshops, and I guess they should not be too hard to find.

Jason Ferruggia – FITTO FIGHT

Let me get out with the thing I do not like about this book. Ferruggia’s writing style at moments tries to hard to portray the tough mo-fo vernacular that may be characteristic of some MMA fighters (and probably even more so among the fans), but in a book it can get a bit corny fairly quickly.

Other than that, this book is very good. It covers all the bases it needs to (although, just like Rooney, the conditioning aspect focuses almost entirely on the anaerobic work. Jamieson really shines in explaining the importance and problems of neglecting the aerobic portion), starting with the author’s view on what makes a good combat athlete; moving onto assessment and injury prevention; proceeding with conditioning part; following is the chapter on strength training; then speed and explosive strength; through nutrition.

The approach to these topics is, naturally, different then in the previous books, but still well thought out and presented. For example, the assessment and testing chapter is excellent, giving a very good insights into what a trainee NEEDS to work on, instead of what they WANT to work. The conditioning section is realized entirely with bodyweight exercises, in the form of circuits and/or interval training, so that eliminates most of the logistics issues that some people whine about.

Now, the strength chapter is interesting…and titled “Strongman Training”. That is because for this purpose Ferruggia recommends the use of equipment such as sandbags, kegs, sledgehammers, dragging sleds and tractor tires. Some coaches see it as a gimmick and a fad, but in my own view it has at least two advantages – it’s affordable and it introduces some novelty into training. The former is self explanatory and the latter is very welcome for people who are struggling to find motivation for additional training. With these implements the fun aspect seems to be stronger, hence helping the motivation.

That said, the author most certainly does not shun from the use of barbells and dumbbells. They come in as a staple of his approach to explosive power and speed, as depicted in the designated section of the book, along with ply boxes, medicine balls etc. Like in Ronney’s book, Ferrugia also gives the planned workouts to follow. Again, good for a fighter who has no S&C coach, nor inclination to learn that part of the craft; not all that good in the long term.

It bears saying that Ferruggia’s professional background is in fitness training, and the man has gained, deservedly so, quite a following and reputation in that domain. This foundation really comes out well in the chapter on nutrition…

…but absolutely shines in the one dealing with supplements! Like it or not, hordes of people, on various level of training, are using those. Like so many others, the author underlines the necessity for a good diet, but on the highest levels of MMA training the demand on the body is tremendous, so it is much better to have some practical and coherent info on enhancing your eating plan, than listening to hearsay stories from “a friend of my buddy, who dates a sister of this dude who…”, you know how these things can get out of hand.

Finally, my favorite section of this book is dedicated to the recovery and regeneration from training. It is also the one that makes this book unique comparing to the previously reviewed. By know, everybody should be aware that the desired adaptations of the body come from training, but during the resting periods. With so many people training in a haphazard manner, with the only guideline being the overused principle of “no pain, no gain”, it’s no winder many of them end up finding their performance being worse from all the training, instead of improving. Ferrugia provides some extremely valuable advice and guidance here, especially for the people who like/need a proactive approach to recovery. Be warned though – you will not like all the methods he advocates!

The “Fit to Fight” is also widely available throughout the Internet, both in printed and electronic formats, so you should not have any trouble getting a copy.

Other worthy mentions

The above books and authors are certainly not the only out there to deal with the subject that concerns us here. They are, nevertheless, the ones I have found most adequate to be used in one’s training with good transfer to specific performance requirements. Keep in mind a couple of things, though – this review is still a PERSONAL opinion, and only speaking of the products I have seen and used so far. Be as it may, there are a couple more books you may want to check out.

Charles Staley – THE SCIENCE OF MARTIAL ARTS TRAINING


This is book was published quite long ago, before the above ones, so the treatment of the topic is…well, consequent. Namely, the training methods presented in this one may not be cutting-edge and resulting from direct interaction with top-level competitors in a sport as physically demanding as MMA, but there are some other dimensions that make it a valuable read. First, it may appeal much better to all those people who do martial arts/sports other than MMA. For them, Staley does a beautiful job out of explaining the need to include some sort (preferably well organized) of physical preparation in their overall training. Second, with its design based on the so-called concurrent periodization, it possibly provides a better long term base for younger practitioners and those competing in sports that boil down to one or two tournaments a year.


Mark Hatmaker – THE ULTIMATE GUIDE TO CONDITIONING

Like all of his other works, this manual is written in a very straightforward fashion and with hands-on attitude in mind. What I liked about it is the approach from the standpoint of movement patterns (hinge, squat, pushing, pulling), as well as the treatment of topics such as breathing while exercising and grip training. For amateur fighters, who do not have either time or resources/access to logistics, this is a nice and handy book.

Ross Enamait – INFINITE INTENSITY


It was with heavy heart that I put this one in the “lower ranks” of this review. You see, I really like everything written by Ross Enamait, because it is very hard, if not impossible, to find a guy who attacks his subject with so much honesty and directness. The man himself was fighter and trains other fighters, so all his info is tried and tested. Speaking of which, it applies to any of his books, and you simply cannot go wrong with Enamait. However, I think he could use an advisor when it comes to putting a finishing touch on his products. The presentation, in technical terms, is not up to par with the information he gives. Anyway, the high point of this book is its emphasis on training the motor qualities, and using various tools as means to an end. In the days when so many people are obsessed with the tool (be it kettlebells, Bulgarian bags, resistance bands, what have you), it is really refreshing to see this kind of emphasis on getting the job done! 






[i] This is what I had in mind in the first note.





[i] While all three main books reviewed are aimed primarily at the performance in MMA, once you understand the material therein, you should be able to apply it for your own needs.

Wednesday, August 31, 2011

Why do it?


One of the main things that make people outside martial arts look at us “insiders” as immature, hormone-raging and irrational types is certainly the shape that some of the martial art discussions (read: meaningless quarrels) take. Essentially there are two types of those – first the inner disputes within the same system/style, second the “whose d!ck is bigger” debate among the practitioners of different ones. The former case is almost always politically motivated, so I am not going to delve into it here and now.

The second kind, however, as it seems to me, tends to be more or less sincere in the beginning, but deteriorates due to some fundamental lack of understanding between the parties involved. My experience tells me that on most occasions those irreconcilable disputes are based on the failure of all sides involved to understand and acknowledge their own and other people’s motivation to do martial arts in the first place. I will try here to offer a view that could maybe help in preventing of dissolving such waste of energy.

Let me start outright by saying that I feel almost any motive to get involved with training in martial arts is legit, as long as it is authentic. By authentic, I mean entirely based on interior benefits, and excluding exterior ones (commercial success, social status and similar). Some of the more common ones that we see are:
-         the genuine need for self-defense skills;
-         the need to build one’s self-confidence and sense of well being;
-         a cultural/ethnological study of sorts;
-         means of recreation;
-         competing in sport events;
-         spiritual uplifting and/or self-actualization.

Now, it is obvious (at least I hope it is) that each of these motives requires different approach to and emphasis in training in order to be realized. Therefore, whenever you look to join a martial art class, ask yourself what are you looking for and why are you doing it. Try to answer your own question as sincerely and honestly as possible, as it would save you a lot of time, frustration and disappointment later. Once you know what makes you tick, you can set off on finding a right school for you.

It means that your driving motivation will decide on which elements of the whole package may have more or less importance in whether you choose to join a particular group – is there a required uniform or not; are there some customs/rituals that are mandatory; is there emphasis on the original terminology etc.

For example, if you really do need realistic self-defense methods, especially in hurry, you ought to seek a school or a program that teaches some sort of combatives. Certainly the best known such type of system today is krav maga, but most other RBSD methods that focus on scenario type training and stressing adequate physical and psychological attributes will do just fine. On the other hand, in this case the only rituals observed should be those relating to the safety in training and the uniform should not play that much of a role.

Should you be on the quest to learn more about some culture’s expression embodied in its form of martial art(s), it is then certainly important to embrace the whole thing – uniforms, terminology, proper code of conduct (as long as it does not stand in direct opposition with you own set of deeper values), hierarchy…

However, it is my firm belief that the relations that may be of utmost importance within the school, during training, should not necessarily transfer to your daily life. In other words, please do not be a medieval ninja or a renaissance nobleman fencer, nor an MMA athlete or a SEAL commando at your daily job as a post office clerk, as it will usually make you a modern day jackass. Whatever you do, it only makes sense in its proper context.



 Those in need of some recreation after hours of sitting at work might be more concerned about the proximity and cost of the class that about the actual material being taught.

By now you should get the idea and the main point of my lecture, but there is one aspect that needs be addressed individually. When it comes to the whole spiritual/mental aspect of training martial arts, I really feel that if you mange to find a healthy environment in which the training is conducted, and you work with dedication and commitment, the spiritual and mental improvement will come on its own, almost as a side-effect of your training. Personally, I’d say that if you are searching primarily for that kind of effect, you will be better off doing yoga or practicing one of the many meditation methods out there (DISCLAIMER: look for proper guidance here and I am not recommending anybody’s approach in particular). Otherwise, you will be frustrating other people in you martial art club who are there for actual training.

And now, back to being sincere and honest with yourself. If you are, you will avoid getting involved in an argument over the street-effectiveness of aikido, tae-bo and capoeira, or the authenticity of lineage in kickboxing or MMA. That said, nevertheless, it is a fact that even within the same general system or style of martial art, some schools will put more emphasis on one aspect of training or another, so you might want to do some previous research into that as well.


Finally, there is one more thing left to stress here. It is normal for people, especially those who are into it for a long time, to change their point of view or focus of interest in training, so there is nothing bad in changing schools, trying out new things or combining two or more training approaches on one’s own personal path through the world of martial arts.