Basically fundamental

I was asked on several occasions if I had ever gone to coach a training session without knowing what I would do? In short, the answer is - no! Admittedly, I have appeared in sessions without previously planning the class, more than once. So, how come the answer to the question was negative? Quite simply, there is a super important aspect of training that you can always revisit without feeling guilty... As the matter of fact, if you are not training every day, and making it part of that daily training, you are probably in need of more. It is called - BASICS!

If a man of Virgil Hunter's caliber, coaching champions, stresses the importance of fundamental techniques and tactics, who am I to dispute it? After all, he works with champions and challengers in a tough world of professional boxing, where the failure to train properly is very costly in so many ways.

Now, some may argue that the entire technical arsenal of boxing is rather basic in general, and that other combative systems operate in a more diverse circumstances, hence demanding more variety in training, too. Say, weapon based methods would be like that, right? Well, not exactly. Namely, while the challenges that the practitioners of non-sportive approaches to combat may be of wider scope, effective responses to them are, nonetheless, based on a limited set of mechanical and tactical principles that are best adopted through the diligent practice of those system's basics.

Interestingly enough, most advanced practitioners, and particularly those good in actual fighting, enjoy the constant focus on fundamentals, because they tend to always find new applications and variations of those underlying principles. And it is exactly those novel expressions and applications that make "new and advanced" techniques, but are only possible owing to the incessant drilling of foundations. My main FMA instructor Roger Agbulos keeps repeating his mantra of "advanced techniques being fundamentals done really well", and when you get to spar him, the deep trueness of this sentiment becomes very obvious.

Besides, this attitude is not limited to martial endeavors either. Legendary NFL coach Vince Lombardi is famous for starting the 1961 season with Green Bay Packers by gathering the team and saying: "Gentlemen...this is a football!" Another legendary coach, this time from basketball, John Wooden, would even go so far to teach his players how to put on their socks and tie their shoes.

Finally, there is one important distinction we ought to have in mind. When I rant about fundamentals here, it does not mean the disciplinary methods, i.e. customs and protocols aimed at teaching the students proper etiquette and conduct during classes (not that this is unimportant), but rather the aforementioned tenets and principles that form the technical and tactical groundwork of any given system. And with that in mind, the best way to get to the advanced levels of training is to find joy and pleasure in working on the basics.

In the long term, it is not about how soon you can skip to the next phase, but rather how long you can stay at the same and find it beneficial. 

Goal setting...

...is overrated. I sincerely think that. While we do need some sort of metrics to see how much we have been progressing, if at all, in certain undertakings, in my view the entire "goal setting for increased productivity" mantra has been ridiculously overused. And at this time of the year, I have the similar sentiment about New Year resolutions.

In case you are wondering, this is not some rant aimed at venting out, nor am I in the bad mood. The thing is, for the most part I am enjoying the life as it is, in the sense of journey taking precedence over destination. Therefore, the grand majority of things I do in life, at least those I with passion, need no clear quantification in order to make me happy about them. As long as I enjoy the process and see/feel progress (even if not constant), it is good.

Such attitude is probably what enables me to be in this whole martial artsy thing for a long run, and hopefully with more place and capacity for growth over many more years. And there sure have been accomplishments over time, but I tend to see them more as milestones and highlights along the way, rather than something to be taken as goals in and of themselves. While it was not part of some master plan at the outset, I allow for my motives, goals and aspirations to grow, shift and change organically with age and maturity in training, and in retrospect it seems to have been the right recipe for me.

With that in mind, I actually look forward with optimism for what the future will bring...

Happy holidays!

Bang for the buck

Last week I did a favor for a new friend, 15-ish years younger than me, and he was somewhat confused and surprised that I didn't want any sort of monetary compensation. I answered that I had been on the beneficiary side of similar situations before, so this was my opportunity to pass a good deed. It brought to mind the saying that "All the best things in life are free", and I wasn't sure whether that is right or not.

I guess everybody has their own, personal gauge of evaluating things in life, particularly in terms of "bang for the buck". To keep things in the domain of martial arts and training related things, I have received some free instruction over the years, and paid rather heftily for some other. I have also conducted both free and paid classes. On the receiving side, I can honestly say that some of those free sessions were much better than some of those paid ones, and yet, I do not regret paying for those that I did. All those experiences were instrumental in building my view of what is a large and important segment of my life, mostly in good ways, so I am grateful for having gone through them. However, I do not necessarily hold the instruction or lessons that came detached from monetary compensation any less valuable that the costly ones. After all, I feel I have paid for the former with my sincere effort, sweat, bruises and bumps, even blood occasionally. Some of the people who offered them are my friends to his day...as are some of those whom I paid to learn from. As the matter of fact, this very blog started as my attempt to pay dues and express gratitude for everything good that has happened to me over the past tree decades (and some) in and around martial arts.

On the other hand, it is definitely true that there are persons out there who have hard time appreciating things they do not have to pay for. That does not deter me from still teaching for free when it feels right. Have I made wrong assessments in this regard sometimes? Yes! But there have been good calls, too, and those are cherished moments.

Nowadays it might be more difficult, especially for younger practitioners, to have the appreciation for some things, with all the freely available stuff on the internet, bot excellent and awful. The way I see it, it just makes me all the more happy when presented with the chance to make difference and set a positive example in someone else's life experiences...even if it turns out to be mistake.

Investing in future

Teaching martial arts to kids is something I have always been reluctant to do. My main issue is that, the way I see it, it just doesn’t work well in mixed groups, i.e. it requires a dedicated children’s group. The nature of the material taught is not even among the top priorities here, but rather the training methodology and dynamics of the class, if you’re going to keep the kids’ interest and have them stay long enough to reap some benefits from training.

There is, however, an avenue of training with children that only occurred to me recently – private sessions. Namely, my own son (10 years old) has shown some interest in my weapons training and I agreed to teach him some. Obviously, this sort of approach has its ups and downs.

On the positive side, we are able to squeeze some training whenever it is convenient, and possibly more importantly, it doesn’t have to go on for a full hour, or whatever designated duration. It makes things easier with keeping them focused, although some variation in training is still required. That said, I find it neat to have two or three activities planned and then rotate through them in 2-3 minute intervals. The biggest point to remember, as it seems to me, is that the kids basically need to know the purpose of the activity if you want them to do it with any semblance of attention and commitment. For example, isolated footwork drills or swinging sticks along predetermined angles can be a drag, but replace the stick with a sword replica, instead of abstract angles put some kind of target to elicit the same movement, and move the target a bit –and you’re in a game!

The downside that prevails, in our particular case, is the attitude during the training session. My son has this high-curiosity type of personality and will easily slip into the “why this, why not that?” rabbit hole that wastes time. On the other hand, if I cut him short and make him proceed without an answer he will have hard time getting back to focused work. It may be the main advantage of group work, as the children will somehow feel less inclined toward endless rambling with other peers around.

OK, so, how does this experience transfer to teaching kids privately, as clients? Honestly, I have no idea. It’s not something that really piques my interest, for many reasons. I do have ulterior motives in teaching my own, though. Namely, besides all the right reasons for doing it, in terms of benefits for the kid, I actually hope to “build” my own training partner in a few years, that could, hopefully, help push my training further and maintaining a good regimen year-round, regardless of training seasons and vacations, or the availability of other training partners.

Old news

There is this thing I have been hearing more frequently lately, although this kind of topic has been around since forever, but probably I haven’t been paying attention. Maybe the “tipping point” was a conversation my wife had with a renowned taekwondo coach here, and who happens to be an “ancient” friend of mine, i.e. we started training TKD together back in 1991. Long story short, he said we trained differently back then, and the modern-day Olympic training and trainees are different, too. So, after that the old school vs. new school duality began popping up more often. I gave the subject some thought, and you will read about my conclusions here, but I would love to hear/read about your thoughts, either in comments or elsewhere.

The first aspect that crossed my mind was that the main difference is in training methods, which should be improving with time, especially when there is a sport modality to a martial art in question. That involves technological advancements as well, with regards to training equipment, protective gear, electronic scoring etc. The changes in competition rules can have major impact to the tactical and technical emphasis and development of a system. With all of the above, the “new school” should be better, right?

However, if that is the case, how come some older practitioners end up often having the upper hand in sparring or fighting the younger ones, even when they do not necessarily embrace all the innovations? We all have seen it happen in both striking systems (boxing, kickboxing, weapon arts) and grappling methods (BJJ, wrestling, judo). Sure, experience will play a significant role, but if that was a decisive factor, then the attributes of youth (cardio, speed, strength) would take a back seat, so the older the exponent would only get better with age…but things are not so linear.

In my own view the advantage of the “new school” IS in the enhanced training methods, there is simply no way around it, but the advantage of the “old school” must be the attitude of its representatives. In simple terms, in the yesteryear we did not take the availability of good instruction (if any at all) for granted. That means that the percentage of members in any martial art program who were highly passionate about it and therefore ready for sacrifice and commitment, was notably higher. As a result, there were fewer dropouts and higher percentage of good exponents coming out of most schools/clubs that were existing at the time.

For example, there were no TKD clubs in my town, so I had to travel 20 miles to the capital city 4-5 times a week for training…and I did it for 4 years, before opening my own club back home. Most guys in that original group were commuters as well, and we all noted that in our own clubs afterwards the people who lived closest to the gym were also the flakiest about training. I did the same with some other arts I tried, and with similar results.

Another thing is the proliferation of all kinds of martial arts through the internet media. Nowadays, any initially interested person can easily get lost in a gazillion Youtube videos, and then be overly picky about what they want to train, even without any understanding whatsoever. I have met quite a few youth who will not train anything else but ________ (fill in the blank) thing they saw somewhere on the Internet, but even without training will gladly offer their unsolicited opinion all those other systems they won’t train in.

Interestingly enough, many of my “fellow old-timers” see the massive presence of Youtube as both sides of the curse/blessing coin. Namely, if one has already gained some experience in actual hands-on training, it can be a valuable source of further information and inspiration in personal advancement. But, if at issue is someone whose entire “expertise” stems from hours of watching those same videos, it could lead to many misunderstandings and delusions.

So, where does it leave us? I honestly don’t know. As it seems, the survival of good fighting methods and schools, or their evolution, depends on the new generation practitioners able to cultivate old generation’s mindset while maintaining their own era’s advantages.

Bisaya eskrima DVD

I first met Bruno Cancho back in 2008, while on my honeymoon to Barcelona. Previously I had asked one of my arnis/eskrima instructors Dan Lamac about anyone to see for some lessons in that part of Spain, and owing to Dan’s recommendation and contacts Bruno agreed to see me. He happened to be a great guy and an excellent proponent of medio-corto approach, due to his training in Koredas Obra Mano and Balintawak systems of FMA.

Bruno Cancho...

Far forward another decade, and Bruno has spent so much time in the Philippines in the meantime that one has to wonder now if that has not become his actual homeland. His extensive study of Visayan styles of arnis and eskrima turned him into a top notch instructor in his chosen field, i.e. medio and corto ranges of combat. It was, therefore, with great joy that I saw the publishing of his instructional DVD about his school, titled “Bisaya Eskrima, vol.1”.

According to Bruno himself, his system is comprised of 20% long range material (largo distance), so naturally he chose to focus the first video on closer range, as he refers to it corto serrada, utilizing single stick. Even more importantly, this material, to my knowledge, is the first commercially available instructional video on the not widely known school of Arnes Diablo which stresses empty-handed defense against knife attacks.

...and his new work

Regarding the stick, the material covers the basic angles of attack and corresponding blocks and counters, 5 ways of attacking/hitting (nothing to do with the JKD methodology of the same name) and accordingly the five types of counters. Everything is shown as solo and partner practice, plus the very important training method of palakaw.

When it comes to the knife material, shown are the 6 basic angles of attack and their defensive responses, with emphasis on disarming the opponent. Especially interesting is the drilling of follow-up actions after potentially failed primary responses, intertwined with retention options for the knife wielding person.

The quality of the instruction, however, is not the only valuable thing here. Namely, the video is beautifully edited to show the life in the Cebu region of the Philippines, and it gives the viewing experience a special flavor. To top it off, the author features two guest local masters, Rodrigo Maranga of Combate Eskrima Maranga and Danny Vedua of Askal Hybrid Arnis (both offshoots of Balintawak), who demonstrate certain aspects of their respective arts. Complementing these aspects is the fact that the entire footage is recorded outdoors – stick portion either in the parks and woods of the Philippines; knife segment in the back alleys of Cebu, thus giving it additional air of authenticity. NOTE: with the exception of guest instructors, who speak English in the video, the instruction is done in Spanish. Still it did not diminish the viewing and learning experience, because everything is done in such a clear and precise manner (I do not speak Spanish, but maybe my speaking French was of some help in understanding everything).

Going back to my comments of Bruno Cancho’s being a great guy and adopting the Philippines as his second home, the entire profits from the promotional sales of the digital videos were directed to the Doors of Hope organization that deals with prevention and stopping of the sexual abuse of children and women in the Philippines. As if the actual quality of the product were not enough to make you happy about purchasing it, he really did the extra step to make you feel even better about it. You can order the video and see the trailer here:

https://www.bisayaeskrima.com/dvd

In conclusion, this is one of the best FMA instructional videos I have seen produced in the past few years, and I look forward to the second volume.

Pieces of the puzzle

All the founders of martial art styles and systems were those rare geniuses that come once in a… No, wait! Really?  If that were true, then how come we have so many of them? Is it possible that just a relatively small place such as Okinawa gave birth to so many geniuses in less than half century, some 150 years ago? Not to mention much larger cultures, such as those in China, India etc. Thousands of martial expressions in the East Asia alone. And there is one more thing… How come we often see quite notable differences among the practitioners of the same system?

If you take a look at the above comment, you will see two equally important attributes being mentioned: personal and traditional. At the first glance those might seem to be contradictory. After all, the whole point of traditional training is to do the things the same way they have been done for centuries, just like the founders, right? Well, sort of. If you think about it a little, and do some research, you will find out that those very founders have actually codified their own personal expression of the previous traditions, and named them (or their students did). Which means, in turn, that tinkering and experimenting with your training is the traditional approach anyway.

But, how is different to modern, non-traditional approach then?

First, nowadays more people have the tendency to give new names to their personal expressions (hey, we live in the world of brands and marketing!), although there still many of those who keep training, doing their own thing, without stopping to think about how to call it. Second, we live in the information age, when instructors are not so secretive and more open towards cross training. It is, therefore, no wonder we can choose among dozens of schools and styles. Matter of fact, we don’t need to pick just one! Heck, why not attend a few and combine the stuff into our own system!?

Wasted time and effort

This is the problem of the media age. It’s just too easy to get lost in the huge amount of information all at once, but without certain filters in place it can be exceedingly difficult to make the right selections and see if they fit together. I remember a guy coming to an instructor friend of mine who teaches sort of JKD-inspired MMA and asking for Wing Chun lessons, in order to better deal with the clinch range. Asked how he would deal with grappling, the guy answered “I do aikido for that purpose”. He did not think for a second about the gap between the underlying principles of the two systems, but started from the perceived strength of each. Also, and even more importantly, he flat out refused to join that MMA+ class (as my friend called it) which already had worked out the work in different ranges of combat; instead he preferred developing his own system after the hefty experience of six month of martial training.

Another issue is the failure to recognize the most probable challenges and problems you would face, depending on your reason for training, but instead focusing the rare extremes that get the attention of the media. This is where people dedicated inordinate amounts of time to various lapel grabs and two-handed holds, while completely neglecting tackles, headlocks and standing guillotine chokes. In other words, inexperienced practitioners engage in cross training looking for solutions, while not seeing the problems in the first place.

The way I see it, there are two paths to finding the proper fit in cross training, and they are not mutually exclusive.

Yeah!

One, join a club/group that does something different than you, and accept being their “toy”, thus experiencing the problems their style might put before you. Then go back and see what answers you can find by digging deeper into your own system, its technical principles and tactical tenets. This may require some adaptation of the stuff you have been already doing, but that is where the  personal aspect comes in.

Two, if unable to solve the problem on your own devices, then go elsewhere for instruction. However, keep an eye open for the potential problems that may arise from their solutions, i.e. opening doors for new problems, especially if those new problems are more serious that the ones you came to solve.

Personally, if training different systems, I usually keep them separated for a while before even looking at amalgamation possibilities. Sometimes, in fortunate circumstances, such possibilities will present themselves, kind of jumping out at you as a pleasant surprise. Other times it will take conscious analysis and pondering to direct your research. Of course, there is always the possibility of not finding the right fit between the two, and that’s perfectly fine. In that case you can either drop one thing, or stay with it for its own sake.

Naturally, you may be entirely satisfied staying for the same system for years or decades, and I have utmost respect for people who do that. Again, people’s motives for starting a martial art may vary widely and wildly, so as long as your are able to find something according to your needs you should be fine…just be honest with yourself.