Old news

There is this thing I have been hearing more frequently lately, although this kind of topic has been around since forever, but probably I haven’t been paying attention. Maybe the “tipping point” was a conversation my wife had with a renowned taekwondo coach here, and who happens to be an “ancient” friend of mine, i.e. we started training TKD together back in 1991. Long story short, he said we trained differently back then, and the modern-day Olympic training and trainees are different, too. So, after that the old school vs. new school duality began popping up more often. I gave the subject some thought, and you will read about my conclusions here, but I would love to hear/read about your thoughts, either in comments or elsewhere.

The first aspect that crossed my mind was that the main difference is in training methods, which should be improving with time, especially when there is a sport modality to a martial art in question. That involves technological advancements as well, with regards to training equipment, protective gear, electronic scoring etc. The changes in competition rules can have major impact to the tactical and technical emphasis and development of a system. With all of the above, the “new school” should be better, right?

However, if that is the case, how come some older practitioners end up often having the upper hand in sparring or fighting the younger ones, even when they do not necessarily embrace all the innovations? We all have seen it happen in both striking systems (boxing, kickboxing, weapon arts) and grappling methods (BJJ, wrestling, judo). Sure, experience will play a significant role, but if that was a decisive factor, then the attributes of youth (cardio, speed, strength) would take a back seat, so the older the exponent would only get better with age…but things are not so linear.

In my own view the advantage of the “new school” IS in the enhanced training methods, there is simply no way around it, but the advantage of the “old school” must be the attitude of its representatives. In simple terms, in the yesteryear we did not take the availability of good instruction (if any at all) for granted. That means that the percentage of members in any martial art program who were highly passionate about it and therefore ready for sacrifice and commitment, was notably higher. As a result, there were fewer dropouts and higher percentage of good exponents coming out of most schools/clubs that were existing at the time.

For example, there were no TKD clubs in my town, so I had to travel 20 miles to the capital city 4-5 times a week for training…and I did it for 4 years, before opening my own club back home. Most guys in that original group were commuters as well, and we all noted that in our own clubs afterwards the people who lived closest to the gym were also the flakiest about training. I did the same with some other arts I tried, and with similar results.

Another thing is the proliferation of all kinds of martial arts through the internet media. Nowadays, any initially interested person can easily get lost in a gazillion Youtube videos, and then be overly picky about what they want to train, even without any understanding whatsoever. I have met quite a few youth who will not train anything else but ________ (fill in the blank) thing they saw somewhere on the Internet, but even without training will gladly offer their unsolicited opinion all those other systems they won’t train in.

Interestingly enough, many of my “fellow old-timers” see the massive presence of Youtube as both sides of the curse/blessing coin. Namely, if one has already gained some experience in actual hands-on training, it can be a valuable source of further information and inspiration in personal advancement. But, if at issue is someone whose entire “expertise” stems from hours of watching those same videos, it could lead to many misunderstandings and delusions.

So, where does it leave us? I honestly don’t know. As it seems, the survival of good fighting methods and schools, or their evolution, depends on the new generation practitioners able to cultivate old generation’s mindset while maintaining their own era’s advantages.